Why Some Inflators Explode and Kill
Takata airbag defects represent one of the most serious safety failures in automotive history. What was designed as a life-saving device instead became a source of catastrophic injury and death for drivers and passengers worldwide.
Unlike ordinary airbag malfunctions, defective Takata inflators can rupture violently during deployment, sending metal fragments into the vehicle cabin. These failures have occurred in low-speed crashes, routine collisions, and situations where occupants otherwise would have walked away unharmed.
Understanding what went wrong with Takata airbags requires examining the inflator design, the use of ammonium nitrate, the role of moisture and heat, and what Takata and manufacturers knew as evidence of danger accumulated.
The Core Takata Airbag Defect Explained
At the center of the Takata airbag defect is the inflator—the metal canister that houses the chemical propellant used to inflate the airbag. Takata chose to use ammonium nitrate as the primary propellant, a decision that ultimately proved disastrous.
Unlike more stable propellants used by other airbag manufacturers, ammonium nitrate is:
- Highly sensitive to moisture
- Chemically unstable over time
- Prone to rapid, uncontrolled combustion
As ammonium nitrate degrades, it can burn too fast during deployment. Instead of generating gas at a controlled rate, pressure builds rapidly inside the inflator housing, causing it to rupture explosively sending pieces of metal shrapnel into the occupants and into the cabin.
Why Ammonium Nitrate Was a Dangerous Choice
Ammonium nitrate is widely known to be volatile under certain conditions. While it can function as an airbag propellant when properly stabilized, Takata’s design lacked sufficient safeguards.
Key problems included:
- Use of ammonium nitrate without a desiccant (drying agent) in many inflators
- Long-term exposure to moisture and humidity
- Temperature cycling that accelerated chemical breakdown
Over time, these factors caused the propellant to become unstable, increasing the likelihood of rupture with each passing year.
Moisture, Heat, and the Role of Climate in Inflator Explosions
Scientific testing and real-world data showed that heat and humidity dramatically increase rupture risk. Moisture infiltrates the inflator housing over time, accelerating ammonium nitrate degradation.
This is why ruptures occurred more frequently in hot, humid states, including:
- Florida
- Texas
- Louisiana
- Alabama
- Mississippi
- Georgia
- South Carolina
- Hawaii
However, Takata airbag ruptures have occurred nationwide. No recalled vehicle should be considered safe based on geography alone. Used cars that “lived” in high moisture conditions for many years can be found licensed in all 50 states, To be sure, check your vehicles VIN # now
Related safety guidance can be found on the Do Not Drive / Alpha page.
What Happens When a Takata Inflator Explodes
When a defective Takata inflator deploys:
- The ammonium nitrate burns too rapidly
- Pressure builds uncontrollably inside the metal canister
- The inflator housing ruptures
- Metal fragments are expelled at high velocity
These fragments act like shrapnel from an explosive device. Victims are struck by metal, not just fabric or gas.
This failure mode explains why Takata injuries differ from typical airbag injuries and often involve catastrophic harm.
Learn more about Shrapnel/metal fragments injuries caused by defective inflators.
Signature Injuries Linked to Takata Airbag Defects
Takata inflator ruptures have caused:
- Penetrating facial and neck injuries
- Eye injuries and blindness
- Skull fractures and traumatic brain injuries
- Internal bleeding and organ damage
- Fatal injuries resulting in wrongful death
Many of these unique Takata airbag injuries are considered “signature injuries” because their pattern is consistent with metal shrapnel, not blunt trauma, or from the normal deployment of an airbag.
The Growing Evidence of Dangerous Inflators
Early rupture incidents were initially treated as isolated events. However, internal testing and field reports increasingly demonstrated a pattern of failure tied to ammonium nitrate degradation.
As reports mounted:
- Injuries became more severe
- Failures occurred in newer vehicles
- Geographic patterns emerged
Despite these warning signs, millions of vehicles remained on the road with defective inflators.
Takata Concealment Timeline: What the Company Knew
Evidence uncovered through regulatory investigations, litigation, and internal documents shows that Takata became aware of serious inflator safety issues years before full public recalls were issued. Rather than an isolated engineering mistake, the Takata crisis involved delayed disclosure and concealment of defect evidence as risks escalated.
Early 2000s – Warning Signs Emerge
Takata begins using ammonium nitrate as an airbag propellant without adequate drying agents. Early internal testing reveals inconsistent inflator performance, including abnormal pressure levels during deployment.
2004–2007 – Failed Tests and Internal Concerns
Internal tests show ruptures and excessive pressure in certain inflators. Reports indicate concerns about moisture sensitivity and long-term stability, particularly in hot and humid environments.
2008 – First Recalls, Limited Scope
After injuries occur, initial recalls are issued but are narrowly defined. Takata and automakers describe failures as isolated incidents rather than systemic defects.
2010–2013 – Growing Injury Reports
More ruptures and serious injuries are reported worldwide. Evidence later revealed that some test results were altered or not fully disclosed to regulators during this period.
2014–2015 – Regulatory Action and Exposure
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) determines that Takata airbags pose an unreasonable risk to safety. Large-scale recalls are ordered as internal documents and whistleblower information reveal delayed disclosures.
2017 – Criminal Resolution and Bankruptcy
Takata pleads guilty to criminal charges related to wire fraud and is forced into bankruptcy. The company admits to providing misleading information about inflator safety while defective airbags remained on the road.
Present – Ongoing Risk
Despite recalls, millions of vehicles remain unrepaired. As inflators continue to age, the risk of rupture persists, leading to new Do Not Drive warnings and continued injuries.
Why the Concealment Matters for Victims
The delayed disclosure of known risks allowed defective inflators to remain in vehicles long after safer alternatives existed. For victims, this history is critical because it:
- Explains why recalls expanded repeatedly
- Supports product liability and failure-to-warn claims
- Demonstrates that injuries were preventable
- Establishes accountability beyond simple engineering error
This concealment timeline is a key reason Takata airbag cases are treated as serious product defect litigation, not routine recall claims.
Why the Takata Defect Worsened Over Time
Unlike manufacturing defects that cause immediate failure, Takata inflators became more dangerous with age. Each year of exposure to heat, humidity, and temperature cycling increased rupture risk.
This delayed danger explains:
- Why recalls expanded repeatedly
- Why older vehicles carry the highest risk
- Why Do Not Drive warnings were issued years later
Check whether your vehicle is affected on the Recall list.
Takata Recalls and Ongoing Risk
Takata airbag recall list began in 2008 and eventually became the largest automotive recall in history. Tens of millions of vehicles were affected across dozens of manufacturers.
Despite recall efforts:
- Many vehicles remain unrepaired
- Some owners never received notice
- Parts shortages delayed repairs
Driving a vehicle with an unrepaired Takata inflator places occupants at ongoing risk.
Class Actions, Takata’s Bankruptcy, and Individual Injury Lawsuits
Takata’s bankruptcy and related class action proceedings addressed certain economic losses, such as vehicle repairs and recall-related costs, but they did not compensate victims for personal injuries or wrongful death. Because Takata is bankrupt, injured individuals generally cannot recover full damages directly through class actions alone. Instead, those harmed by exploding airbags typically must file a separate product liability claim against the automobile manufacturers that installed the defective Takata inflators in their vehicles.
Legal Responsibility for Takata Airbag Defects
Takata airbag cases often involve multiple responsible parties, including:
- Takata as the inflator manufacturer
- Automakers that installed the inflators
- Suppliers and distributors
Automakers are legally responsible for ensuring the safety of the components they place into their cars and trucks. Individual injury lawsuits allow victims to pursue compensation for medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, permanent disability, disfigurement, and wrongful death—damages not covered by recall programs or class settlements. Victims injured by defective inflators may pursue compensation through an airbag inflator rupture lawsuit based on product liability law.
Evidence to Preserve After a Takata Inflator Rupture
Preserving physical and documentary evidence is critical in Takata airbag defect cases. Because inflator ruptures often involve metal shrapnel and unique injury patterns, early evidence preservation can directly impact the success of a claim. Important evidence may include the vehicle and deployed airbag, inflator components or metal fragments, photographs of injuries and vehicle damage, and all related medical records and recall notices. Detailed guidance on evidence to preserve after an inflator rupture can help ensure critical proof is not lost or destroyed.
Fatal Takata Airbag Incidents and Wrongful Death Claims
In the most tragic cases, exploding metal pieces of shrapnel from the Takata inflators have caused fatal injuries to drivers, passengers, and children. When a defective airbag caused or contributed to a death, surviving family members may have legal rights under product liability and wrongful death laws. Understanding available wrongful death lawsuit options can help families pursue accountability and compensation for medical costs, funeral expenses, lost financial support, and the profound personal loss caused by a preventable defect
Why Takata Defect Cases Require Experienced Legal Counsel
Takata airbag defect litigation requires:
- Understanding chemical propellant behavior
- Analyzing recall history and regulatory actions
- Working with engineering and medical experts
- Coordinating multi-party liability claims
Victims may need legal guidance to navigate this complexity and protect their rights.
Get Help If You Were Injured by a Defective Takata Airbag
If you or a loved one were injured by an exploding Takata airbag:
- Seek immediate medical care
- Preserve evidence
- Check recall status
- Learn your legal options
Click now for a Free Case Airbag Injury Consultation with an experienced defective airbag attorney for a confidential review or call us 24/7.
📞 Call now: 1-866-AIRBAGS
No Fees or Expenses Ever Charged to You, Unless We Win